
Connects the question, context and materials.
Aliv@ supports legal work without replacing professional verification: it makes sources, missing data and points to check recognisable before use.

Connects the question, context and materials.
Surfaces data, references and points requiring verification.
Assesses relevance, completeness and applicability.
The conclusion and responsibility remain with the professional.
AI is recognisable, sources remain controllable and final use of outputs stays with the professional.
Aliv@ supports the professional. Final use of analysis, sources and documents requires professional review.
AI involvement should be recognisable and outputs should retain provenance and review status where applicable.
We describe a compliance-readiness path, not generic “full compliance”, until classification, measures and documentation have been validated.
We will publish only verified technical controls and characteristics, avoiding badges or certifications we do not hold.
Aliv@ separates generation from verifiability: provenance, context and knowledge limits should remain visible so the professional can review the elements supporting a conclusion.
It can produce errors, omissions or plausible conclusions that do not apply to the specific matter. Aliv@ therefore does not ask for blind trust: it makes AI involvement recognizable, keeps sources and context checkable, and leaves responsibility for the decision with the user.
Risk is governed through verification and awareness, not through alarmism or automation.